Видео

I listen,I learn. Thank you.

Yep and now you have to obey and affirm same sex marriage or don’t ask don’t tell your opinion or loose your job.

OMG - has Meg Ryan been in an acid attack. The viewer can clearly see she’s had reconstructive face surgery- poor woman.

Let this be a lesson. Stay away from plastic surgery.

sorry but mtl and the gta control all of canada...where most of the leftist live...canada is a shithole now like all your big lefty city because of this

Meg- On The Alley, for Jack, fish and chips, in the harbor. I doubt the moviestar reaction will happen there. The fishermen don't care. Right next to Ledbetter

I've enjoyed her characters in movies long ago. She was adorable. Her plastic surgeon should be sued for destroying her look. It's like the Twilight Zone. WHO IS THIS PERSON ? I don't understand the point of this interview or why she feels it necessary to giggle constantly ? Oh well. We all have to slide with the punches. The Meg Ryan I loved is dead and gone.

1-The Electoral College was designed to have our President chosen indirectly on purposes. The voters of the 1700s aren't as informed of most matters of state as they are today. The President also shouldn't be elected through the Congress, out of fear of the President becoming a tool of Democracy. The most important thing that the Founders wanted to do, was to keep the country united. They feared of the British, French and Spanish trying to divide the nation into separate spheres of influence. 2- The Senate was designed to give all states an equal voice, regardless of size. It serves as a check on the power on the House of Representatives , which is considered to be more "in tune", with the needs of the people. 3-The filibuster was a rule devised by the Senate and could be removed by a simple majority of the Senate. 4-The House could be "more fair" to the bigger states, by passing a law that would eliminate the law increasing the number of Congressional Seats. For example, there could be a replacement of a maximum of 435 House Seats, to maybe 535 or more seats. ( This would also increase the size of the Electoral College. 5-The Supreme Court was purposely given life tenure, so that they won't be pressured to vote "one way or the other" by the legislatures or President. The Justices can not get a paycut, by the Congress.

Wow Meg Ryan looks great

Wow great content! Can we have a little chat?

USA is not "based on" majority rule and civil rights. It is based on individual natural rights, freedom, and private property.

Annoying if your goal is to run the ADMINISTRATIVE STATE. A minimum of protection if you are A CHAMPION OF FREEDOM.

This speaker also sound like he had criticisms of the us senate. Every state has an equal number of senators. This means all states are equal 🟰 n votes. Otherwise why would smaller populated states be part of the USA? If his is why there is also an electoral college for us president. Then candidates would just have to go to the major population centers and promise those areas/people things after the election. And forget about the remaining areas .

What a foolish professor. To amend the Constitution would take a two thirds vote of the Congress and then approval of 3/4 of the state legislatures. If my memory is correct. No way would it pass. This guy is just grandstanding

🤡

god I would do anything to have lunch with her

I mean sure? But if you were to change America to a pure Democracy instead of a Republic then democrats would gain a huge advantage considering most of the populated areas in the country are democrat ran. The whole point of having a republic in the first place is so the needs of cities dont overrule the needs of the more rural areas. America is a MASSIVE country, to put it in perspective, itd be like - if the UK were able to dictate what laws/policies were enacted in Poland. The needs of the two places are entirely different, however simply because the UK has more people the needs of the UK would always be prioritised. This would also lead to the issue of politicians never bothering to get the support of Poland either, why bother when you can focus on the UK to get more votes? Its the same in America. No political system is perfect, Republics and Democracys both have flaws - but they each try to resolve seperate issues.

And Harvard has an unbiased view of the world? Clean up your own house. And let’s talk about your 49 billion in endowments yet you still charge American citizens tuition.

Goes to show the Framers weren't as smart as everyone thinks.

Dude you're from Harvard!

I love how he gives examples of 1/2 of the legislative body, and gives a relatively weak example of how the Judicial branch "favors sparsely populated states" that this is somehow tantamount to the minority groups governing over the heavily populated states. Ummm really guy? Isn't the Executive branch election process based on a number of electors derived from the population of a state? Doesn't this mean that states with more population have more say over the executive branch? And what about the other half of the legislative body of government? Isn't that also based on the census' population numbers? It seems that the framers may have actually come up with a way to treat the minority groups and areas with at least some respect seeing as how the government is never supposed to be based on true majority rule. It's ALWAYS democrats that want to change something about how the country works down to its core whenever the numbers aren't in their favor. Court Packing, Making DC a state, forcing Judicial outcomes to replace legislation, the Democrats are the most corrupt group in the world even more so than the CCP.

The guy is stupid. It protects the minority from the tyranny of a majority.

My question is why is it a problem if the more sparsely populated states are given more weight in some proceedings? The "less sparsely populated" states have hardly demonstrated any particular advantage in the wisdom of their governance. I would argue that the collective sanity level is higher in the less populated states (if only because folks who are less crowded together have way less stress in their lives). It's a classic big city/small town conflict, and i think the framers were wise to try to protect the small town common sense folks from their neurotic urban counterparts.

Or we should just have about five major metropolitan areas decide how the rest of the country should follow huh?

Leftists new trick?

The jerk has the microphone and is talking.

This is why you don't go to Harvard folks. Pure liberal indoctrination.

Let's have pure democracy and see how well that works out. 😅

A union of states, not voters. It's in the f'n name. The United STATES of America.

were not a democracy, hence the LACK of majority rule

The Senate was suppose to represent the State's interests not the peoples. Get rid of the 17th amendment. Also get rid of the 2 party system and let one candidate from each well established party debate. Expand and stop trying to miss lead us with disingenuous statements.

Founding fathers also did not see that people would make a complete life career out of being allocation. These people are in there for their whole lives. 3040 years and you absolutely nothing to earn the money that they collect, except for argue like 17-year-olds arguing over the last dress. Or the girl or whatever. They're just stupid

It is not a problem! It was perfection in our government structure at its finest. The entire point of the united states is self governance. The smaller direct representation of the people was the point, referred to as states rights. The federal government is supposed to stay out if peoples business. The less issues the federal government try to solve the more freedom people have. A large portion of the citizens don't understand this essential exclusively American ideal.

That was the point of the great compromise. We have two congresses because the authors of the constitution couldn't find any other way to solve the clustering problem.

It is a republic not a democracy. It works exactly as it was intended by our brilliant founders.

People are just no damned good!

🤡

They created a system to benefit the slave states!

Study history harder. The two senators have nothing to do with sparse or dense populations. They were intended to represent the states and not the people. They are the check against the mob of pure democracy.

He is a over educated jack ass that's why we have to houses in congress.

maybe lefties should stop openly displaying hatred for the people who live in those states and try to represent some of their concerns and values? but instead they'll keep trying to flood their communities with foreigners, debauch their children, mock their faith, and call them racist.

Why is it a problem now. Because it hurts democrats.

It’s because the sparsely densely populated areas follow the constitution. While the heavily populated areas are a bunch of damn Commies. The Constitution protects us from those freedom hating cities and states.

They want to stack the deck. F all the way off

Of course it's set up like this. We're a REPUBLIC, not a democracy. The republic was chosen so that the minority had a voice so they wouldn't be eaten by the wolves of a majority. You also get more representation in congress, thus evening things out.

That's the point of the Senate, numbnuts.

Government is biased? Take away immunity of elected officials and make those who do crime do the time, not pay the fine. And audit the living F out of their income sources and make every finance decision they make, personal and elected business, be transparent.

Nothing original here and it’s a waste of time talking about it. It won’t be changed

This is such a gift to our family Uncle Bob❤. Rudy and Gigi would be so proud and we are so grateful you’ve done so much to pull together such an amazing history 👏👏

😢